Famous for the wrong book By John Self

 There's a big difference between an author's best-known work, and their best.

                                                                                                                            Photo: Todd Plitt/AP

Joseph Heller: There's only one catch - his best book is Something Happened.

 Why is it that the book for which an author is best known is rarely their best? If history is the final judge of literary achievement, why has a title like Louis de Bernières' Captain Corelli's Mandolin risen to the top, overshadowing his much better earlier novels such as Señor Vivo and the Coca Lord? It's not, I hope, the simple snobbery of insisting that the most popular can't be the finest. (After all, who would dispute that Middlemarch is George Eliot's peak? ... You would? Great, there's a space for you in the comments below.)

 If someone reads Kurt Vonnegut's most famous book, Slaughterhouse-Five, and doesn't like it, I'll want to shout to them, "But it's rubbish! Cat's Cradle is much better! That's the one you want to read!" It's not just me, I'm sure. Geoff Dyer takes the view that it is John Cheever's journals, not his stories, which represent his "greatest achievement, his principal claim to literary survival". Gabriel Josipovici says that it is not Kafka's The Trial or "Metamorphosis" – not any of his novels or stories – which "form [his] most sustained meditation on life and death, good and evil, and the role of art", but his aphorisms.

 So here I am going to list a few instances of a writer being famous for the wrong book, and my suggestions for where their greatest achievement really lies. Below, you can make your own suggestions (someone, please tell me I've just been reading the wrong Peter Carey or Emily Brontë), or let me know just how misguided I am.

Joseph Heller

 Catch-22 is too long, messy and takes 100 pages to get going. Heller's second novel, Something Happened, took even longer to write and justified the time. From its opening line ("I get the willies when I see closed doors"), it is a supremely controlled and meticulous masterpiece, grounded in the horror of daily living. The first time I read it I was overwhelmed. The second time I thought it was hilarious. The third time – getting closer to the age of the horribly honest narrator Bob Slocum – it was terrifying. It's the book that keeps on giving.

Kazuo Ishiguro

 Hard to say exactly which book is his most famous these days. Is it, bafflingly, the inchoate Never Let Me Go, probably his weakest novel? Or the reliable The Remains of the Day, a lovely book to be sure, but really just a refinement of his first two novels? The big one, surely, is The Unconsoled, his bold and brilliant epic of one man's anxiety, via family expectations, dream-logic, and growing up and growing old. It has always been a controversial novel, to be sure: one writer recently called it "unreadable", while another said it was "one of the few readable English novels of the 1990s". Still, when The Unconsoled was featured on Late Review (as it then was) on publication in 1995, Tony Parsons called for copies of it to be burned. What greater recommendation do you need?

Evelyn Waugh

 In the preface to Brideshead Revisited, written 15 years after its first publication, Waugh comments that the book was written in the "privation" of wartime, and that "in consequence the book is infused with a kind of gluttony, for food and wine, for the splendours of the recent past, and for rhetorical and ornamental language which now, with a full stomach, I find distasteful." Quite so. Waugh's strength is as a humorist, the blacker the better, and so A Handful of Dust must be his best work. This is the novel which, in a pivotal scene nobody will forget ("Oh thank God"), taught me what Isaac Babel meant when he said that no iron can pierce the heart with the force of a full stop put at just the right place.

Jeanette Winterson

 Heaven knows Jeanette Winterson has had her literary ups and downs – Gut Symmetries or The PowerBook, anyone? No, didn't think so – but she's always an interesting writer in an age when a willingness to experiment is rarely welcomed. It's sad then that her most famous work remains her only mildly ambitious debut, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. Despite the fairytale insertions and Winterson's revisionist application of a "spiral narrative" to it, it's a straightforward and warm autobiographical novel. For me her finest work – before those "difficult" but still rewarding mid-period novels – is Sexing the Cherry. Written at the disgustingly young age of 29, it's funny, lyrical, clever and surprising, features the massive and memorable Dog Woman, and not incidentally, is very short.

John Wyndham

 The Day of the Triffids is a fine book, albeit tethered unfortunately both to its times (the Commies did it) and a credulity-stretching premise (to make walking plants dangerous, Wyndham had to blind almost everyone on earth). But Wyndham's reputation, coined by Brian Aldiss, as a purveyor of "cosy catastrophes", is unjustified. His masterpiece is The Chrysalids, a tale of religious extremism and social otherness, but most of his novels feel like landmarks of speculative fiction: the creepy kids in The Midwich Cuckoos (famous as its film adaptation Village of the Damned); media and society's responses to disaster in The Kraken Wakes; obsession with youth and beauty in Trouble With Lichen.

 When I raised this subject on Twitter, other suggestions were:
* Aldous Huxley: The Perennial Philosophy over Brave New World
* Salman Rushdie: Haroun and the Sea of Stories over Midnight's Children
* William Golding: The Spire over Lord of the Flies
* Gustave Flaubert: Sentimental Education over Madame Bovary
* James Kelman: A Disaffection over How Late It Was, How Late

 Now, who could argue with any of that?

©guardian.co.uk